Deflation is now the biggest, persistent threat to Western economies. Inflation, recently the major enemy, has swiftly retreated, as widely predicted.

In Britain, many are now waking up to the gravity of the situation. Former Chancellor of the Exchequer, Ken Clarke, has dismissed comparisons with the 1970s, ’80s and ’90s, likening current conditions explicitly with 1929/30.

Normally cautious Bank of England Governor, Mervyn King, forecasts a 2 percent contraction in the British economy next year, with interest rates falling rapidly to nought percent for the first time in history.

Deflation is now the enemy we must all factor in to our expectations in the near-to-medium terms. So why is deflation necessarily worse than inflation?

In an era of massive indebtedness, both private and public, deflation increases the burden. As incomes decline, debts remain the same — at levels signed for in better times. It’s the exact opposite of the apparent wealth created during periods of rapidly rising house prices.

Professor Peter Spencer of York University says, “It is going to be absolute murder in Britain if inflation turns negative. The big difference with past episodes is that we are now much more heavily indebted. Few people owned their own houses in 1930s. Debts were miniscule.”

Another symptom of deflation is that consumers wait for lower prices before shopping, causing job-losses in the High Street and yet more bad economic news. Japan’s “lost decade” of the 1990s is the technically-perfect example of this psychology of fear taking hold. It is still suffering.

So what can be done either to pre-empt or cure the curse of falling prices across the board?

Curiously, Keynesianism which, in its misinterpreted version is disastrous in normal times, does hold out some hope in depressive conditions. Expect central banks to start printing money soon and dropping it from helicopters, if they haven’t started already. Want to buy some rising stock? Buy helicopter shares. [This is not financial advice.]

If you’re one of those noble souls who saved assiduously during the asset bubbles, you will just have to stand by and watch the profligate oafs who caused the problem clean up, while your own responsible hoard of value drains away.

It’s just not fair, but it will probably have to happen “for the greater good”.

You have only one consolation: you can give the politicians who presided over the madness a good kicking at the next electoral opportunity.

Related Stories
Sorry folks there’s a depression in the sea air
The world needs Up-To-A-Pointism
The Kraken Wakes
Depression looms like a yawning abyss

John Maynard Keynes has never been so popular. The name of this world famous British economist, who died in 1946, is on everyone’s lips these days, including Gordon Brown’s.

However, Keynes’s ideas are often misrepresented, or misunderstood, by both Left and Right in politics.

The Left believes his economic strictures are for all occasions, when they were proposed for slump conditions only. The Right thinks his views were Marxist and should never soil their delicate monetarist palette.

In fact Keynes had a lot to say about monetary policy. His flaw is that he was too broad brush on inflation, even appearing to brush it away.

Roger Bootle of Capital Economics has written an excellent summary-for-dummies on Keynes and Keynesianism in the UK’s Daily Telegraph.

Read it here

Related Stories
The world needs Up-To-A-Pointism
Globalization destroys necessary bulkheads
The Kraken Wakes
Depression looms like a yawning abyss

That seems to be a choice that has to be made by each succeeding generation, depending on the business cycle and/or the severity of downturns.

In the current recessionary period the situation is so bad it’s become a crisis in both the financial markets and the real economy. Already many governments are having to nationalize part or all of their banking system. Financial services never seemed so brittle.

Is that really the case though? In a carefully-argued article, The world needs Up-To-A-Pointism, John Evans suggests that by staying within the boundaries where governments and free markets work best, the world would be a much more stable place to live and do business.

Although mostly mutually-exclusive, the interface between regulation and free markets could be made to operate more efficiently, to the benefit of both.

A dollar default is unthinkable in these affluent modern times. Or is it?

Last week a “flight to safety” of investors in America’s $3.5 trillion Treasury money market was only halted by Secretary Henry Paulson’s swift action in nationalising the banking sector’s bad debts.

Read The Great Harvard Sausage Scandal 2008 over at Syntagma.

Of course, most of the movers and shakers have already salted away their massive bonuses and are probably even now relaxing with a cocktail or two on their yachts in Monte Carlo harbour.

They have left us with a colossal mountain to climb. In the UK, house prices have a further 25-30 percent to fall, according to Roger Bootle, and already Britain’s largest mortgage lender, HBOS, has failed. How many other banks will go before we hit bottom?

Read the rest of the article.