During and after the Great Depression of the 1930s many people asked the same question.

As it turned out, capitalism wasn’t dead, just undergoing one of its periods of creative destruction, when old practices and outworn businesses are ruthlessly purged.

Free markets are a natural phenomenon, like grass. If you cut grass, it grows back again. So does capitalism. It is government that is an unnatural construct of human ingenuity. Long, hard-won experience tells us it should be limited in size and scope.

John Evans has written a piece on what will happen to capitalism under the title, Is socialism the new quid on the block?

The “failure” of capitalism should be seen as part of a greater failure involving government and its duties to society. These are principally, sensitive regulation of systemic elements of the modern economy, like banks and other financial services, and ensuring monetary and fiscal balance across its operations.

It is now clear that government has failed systemically over the past decade by taking on too much debt, a condition mirrored in consumers’ personal balance sheets, and by serious mismanagement of the regulatory process.

Read Is socialism the new quid on the block?

UK producer prices data released today show how quickly the recession is developing. The cost of manufacturers’ raw materials dropped by 3.3 percent in November. Add in the rapid falls in oil and commodity prices and even lower figures lie ahead.

Among economists, “quantitative easing” is the topic of the moment. QE, as it’s abbreviated, means getting money in people’s pockets quickly.

Dropping banknotes out of helicopters is an image often used, but basically, central banks simply print more money and buy assets like shopaholics. They may purchase companies, corporate or government bonds, infrastructure projects, anything they can lay their hands on at short notice, in fact.

Howard Archer from IHS Global Insight: “The further substantial falls in producer output and input prices in November reinforces belief that consumer price inflation will plunge over the coming months in reaction to sharply lower oil and commodity prices, waning food prices, contracting economic activity, faster rising unemployment, December’s VAT cut and very favourable base effects. These factors seem certain to easily outweigh the inflationary impact of the very weak pound. Indeed, it seems highly likely that consumer price inflation will move back below the Bank of England’s 2pc target level in the early months of 2009 and will turn negative during the second half of the year.

“Consequently, we expect the Bank of England to enact a further hefty interest rate cut in January as it attempts to limit the length and depth of the recession. At this stage, we forecast the Bank of England to reduce interest rates by a further 75 basis points from 2.00pc to 1.25pc in January, but we would not rule out a larger cut if the economic downturn continues to deepen. We expect interest rates to fall to a low of 0.50pc in the second quarter of 2009 and then stay there for the rest of the year. However, it is far from inconceivable that interest rates could come all the way down to zero.”

It was hardly a well-kept secret. The Bank of England had received a raft of appalling numbers from the real economy this week. It was bound to cut rates deep today.

An hour ago, the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street duly obliged and cut by 100 basis points to two percent, the lowest figure since 1951.

It is clear that this is going to be a steeper and longer slump than most forecasters would own to until very recently. Next year will see the deepest of economic winters across the world.

Reflecting the gloomy forecasts, other central banks are slashing rates too.

Sweden’s central bank today cut its key rate by a record 175 basis points, to two percent, the largest since 1992 when the country famously nationalized its major banks.

New Zealand also announced a cut of 150 basis points to a five-year low of five percent. Further cuts are on the cards.

Indonesia made a surprise 25 basis-point cut to its rate, to 9.25 percent.

Yesterday, the Bank of Thailand cut rates by 100 basis points to 2.75 percent, some of which may have been due to recent political turmoil in the country.

On Tuesday, the Reserve Bank of Australia surprised markets with a 100 basis-point cut to 4.25 percent.

The European Central Bank is expected to cut again today, but signals are mixed. The Shadow ECB has called for swift, deep cuts from its current rate of 3.25 percent. However, voices close to the ECB warned not to expect them. The lack of a strategy is a major criticism of the “Bank without a Treasury”.

All bank authorities are aware that 2010 is the year when inflation will return with a vengeance if a prolonged deflation can be avoided. Most are fighting the latter tooth and nail, while making noises about having the medium term under control.

We shall see.

Deflation is now the biggest, persistent threat to Western economies. Inflation, recently the major enemy, has swiftly retreated, as widely predicted.

In Britain, many are now waking up to the gravity of the situation. Former Chancellor of the Exchequer, Ken Clarke, has dismissed comparisons with the 1970s, ’80s and ’90s, likening current conditions explicitly with 1929/30.

Normally cautious Bank of England Governor, Mervyn King, forecasts a 2 percent contraction in the British economy next year, with interest rates falling rapidly to nought percent for the first time in history.

Deflation is now the enemy we must all factor in to our expectations in the near-to-medium terms. So why is deflation necessarily worse than inflation?

In an era of massive indebtedness, both private and public, deflation increases the burden. As incomes decline, debts remain the same — at levels signed for in better times. It’s the exact opposite of the apparent wealth created during periods of rapidly rising house prices.

Professor Peter Spencer of York University says, “It is going to be absolute murder in Britain if inflation turns negative. The big difference with past episodes is that we are now much more heavily indebted. Few people owned their own houses in 1930s. Debts were miniscule.”

Another symptom of deflation is that consumers wait for lower prices before shopping, causing job-losses in the High Street and yet more bad economic news. Japan’s “lost decade” of the 1990s is the technically-perfect example of this psychology of fear taking hold. It is still suffering.

So what can be done either to pre-empt or cure the curse of falling prices across the board?

Curiously, Keynesianism which, in its misinterpreted version is disastrous in normal times, does hold out some hope in depressive conditions. Expect central banks to start printing money soon and dropping it from helicopters, if they haven’t started already. Want to buy some rising stock? Buy helicopter shares. [This is not financial advice.]

If you’re one of those noble souls who saved assiduously during the asset bubbles, you will just have to stand by and watch the profligate oafs who caused the problem clean up, while your own responsible hoard of value drains away.

It’s just not fair, but it will probably have to happen “for the greater good”.

You have only one consolation: you can give the politicians who presided over the madness a good kicking at the next electoral opportunity.

Related Stories
Sorry folks there’s a depression in the sea air
The world needs Up-To-A-Pointism
The Kraken Wakes
Depression looms like a yawning abyss